Our dedicated Aviation Advisory team bring best-in-class expertise across modelling, lease management, financial accounting and transaction execution as well as technical services completed by certified engineers.
Our Business Risk Services team deliver practical and pragmatic solutions that support clients in growing and protecting the inherent value of their businesses.
Our experienced Deal Advisory team has provided a range of transaction, valuation, deal advisory and restructuring services to clients for the past two decades.
Our FAAS team designs and implements creative solutions for organisations expanding into new markets or undertaking functional financial transformations.
Our Forensic and Investigation Services team have targeted solutions to solve difficult challenges - making the difference between finding the truth or being left in the dark.
Our Risk Advisory team delivers innovative solutions and strategic insights for the Financial Services sector, addressing disruptive forces, regulatory changes, and emerging trends to enhance risk management and foster competitive advantage.
2025 reinsurance renewal: Key trends in property, casualty, and cyber markets. Gain insights on rates, catastrophe losses, and the insurance protection gap.
Our audit services can strengthen your business and stakeholders' confidence. You'll receive professionally verified results and insights that help you grow.
At Grant Thornton we have extensive knowledge and experience in providing tailored solutions to our clients, whether on a short-term or long-term basis.
Our Global Statutory Audit team ensures your statutory audit process follows a well-defined project plan, with no surprises, to maintain compliance across multiple jurisdictions. We invest time to understand your finance function and develop bespoke solutions built on the premise of central effort to remove duplication.
Our Corporate Tax team is made up of more than 40 highly experienced senior partners and directors who work directly with a wide range of domestic and international clients; covering Corporation Tax, Company Secretarial, Employer Solutions, Global Mobility and Tax Incentives.
The Grant Thornton team is made up of experts who are fully up to date in terms of changing and evolving tax legislation. This is combined with industry expertise and an in-depth knowledge of the evolving financial services regulatory landscape.
Grant Thornton’s team of indirect tax specialists helps a range of clients across a variety of sectors including pharmaceuticals, financial services, construction and property and food to navigate these complexities.
We develop close relationships with clients in order to gain a deep understanding of their businesses to ensure they make the right operational decisions. The wrong decision on how a company sells into a new market or establishes a new subsidiary can have major tax implications.
Grant Thornton’s Private Client Services team can advise you on all areas of financial, pension, investment, succession and inheritance planning. We understand that each individual’s circumstances are different to the next and we tailor our services to suit your specific needs.
Managing compliance across companies is time-consuming and often overlooked. Eliminating dormant companies reduces administrative and audit costs, freeing up finance directors.
Looking for a more fulfilling role in professional services? One where fresh thinking, collaboration and diversity are valued? At Grant Thornton we do things...
We offer a range of graduate programmes to help you thrive in your career. Work with and learn from the best in the business, make a difference and excel by...
Grant Thornton Ireland is rapidly approaching 3,000 people, in 9 offices across Ireland, Isle of Man, Gibraltar and Bermuda, and a presence in over 149...
We believe in a connected world — so we created an industry-leading online Alumni Network that focuses on what matters most at Grant Thornton — our people.
Final guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process for investment firms, along with final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Pillar 2 add-ons for investment firms are published.
Contents
Subscribe to our mailing list
Receive the latest insights, news and more direct to your inbox.
In July 2021 the European Banking Authority (EBA) jointly with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), published the final Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) for investment firms (EBA/GL/2022/09).
Along with these guidelines the EBA also published the final draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on Pillar 2 add-ons for investment firms (EBA/RTS/2022/07). The aim of both of these regulatory products is to harmonise the supervisory practices regarding the supervisory review and evaluation process of investment firms.
Supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP)
SREP is one of the main tools for supervision, through which competent authorities form a comprehensive view on the business model and risk profile of the supervised entity, as well as its overall viability and sustainability.
These guidelines, drawn up pursuant to subparagraph 4 of Article 45(2) of Directive (EU) 2019/2034 on the prudential supervision of investment firms, are addressed to competent authorities and intend to promote common practices for the SREP referred to in Article 36 of Directive (EU) 2019/2034.
The guidelines specify common procedures and methodologies for SREP which are proportionate to the different sizes and business models of investment firms, and the nature, scale and complexity of their activities. Investment firms are classified into four distinct categories, which translates into different frequency, depth and intensity of the assessments, and the engagement of the competent authority.
The framework of the guidelines is built around 4 main elements:
business model analysis;
assessment of internal governance and investment firm-wide control arrangements;
assessment of risks to capital and adequacy of capital to cover these risks; and
assessment of risks to liquidity and funding and adequacy of liquidity resources to cover these risks
The consistency and comparability of assessment is facilitated by the common scoring framework, differentiating between risks and viability scores. The scores of individual risks and SREP elements are brought together to form an overall SREP score, reflecting the assessment of the viability of the investment firm.
These guidelines are addressed to competent authorities supervising class 2 and class 3 investment firms and specify the procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation of these firms. The main objective of these guidelines is to ensure consistency in supervisory practices in the assessment of class 2 and class 3 investment firms and in the application of capital and other supervisory measures, and thus to contribute to level playing field for these investment firms across the EU.
Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on Pillar 2 add-ons for investment firms
The RTS on Pillar 2 add-ons for investment firms clarify how competent authorities should measure risks or elements of risks that investment firms face or pose to others, that are not covered or not sufficiently covered by the own funds requirements set out in Part Three and Four of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on the prudential requirements of investment firms.
As investment firms can vary greatly in terms of size, business model, risk profile, complexity and interconnectedness the new regime for investment firms distinguishes between investment firms deemed similar in terms of business models and risk profiles to credit institutions that will remain subject to the prudential and supervisory requirements of the Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Directive 2013/36/EU (Class 1 investment firms), and firms that became subject to the new requirements of the Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 and Directive (EU) 2019/2034, according to their systemic importance, and other criteria including size and types of activities under Directive 2014/65/EU.
The draft RTS is relevant for class 2 and class 3 investment firms, and aim to ensure a consistent and proportionate application of supervisory practices across the Union, providing granular guidance embedding different sizes, business models, and risk profiles of the investment firms, while maintaining risk sensitivity of the calculation of capital requirements under Pillar 2. These draft RTS should be read along with the SREP guidelines under Article 45(2) of Directive (EU) 2019/2034, as the application of additional own funds requirements results from a comprehensive SREP process.
There are various objectives of the own funds requirements for class 2 and class 3 investment firms which the draft RTS differentiates between. Competent authorities must determine any additional own funds requirements to cover the risk of an orderly wind-down which could pose threats to clients, counterparties, and the wider markets in which the firm operates in case of their failure.
In relation to the second objective, which applies to class 2 investment firms only, competent authorities should determine additional own funds requirement to decrease the likelihood of a failure of the investment firm, by covering material risks related to their ongoing activities, including risks to clients, to markets, to the investment firms itself, and risks that are not addressed by any own funds requirements.
The investment firm’s total capital requirements should, at all times, be at least equal to the own funds requirements set out in Part Three and Four of Regulation (EU) 2019/2034. To that aim, the capital considered adequate to cover the risk of unorderly wind-down of an investment firm and the capital considered adequate to cover risks from ongoing activities shall at least be respectively equal to the fixed overhead requirements and K-factor requirements determined in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033.
In addition, investment firms may be exposed to other risks such as ICT risk, interest rate risk in the banking book or credit risk that are not addressed by the minimum own funds requirements, in cases where these risks are material in nature, competent authorities will need to assess their impact separately and consider such impact within the capital considered adequate to cover risks related to the investment firms’ ongoing activities.
What are the next steps?
Investment firms need to understand these new guidelines and draft RTS and manage their business accordingly. Firms will need to review and update their existing business plans, systems and policies to incorporate both the guidelines and draft RTS, adequate resources must be made available to incorporate changes where required.
Why Grant Thornton?
Grant Thornton’s Financial Services Risk, Consulting and Advisory teams are comprised of dedicated experts who are experienced in supporting investment firms with a variety of regulatory challenges, including those arising from the new SREP guidelines and draft RTS.
In particular, our industry-leading Prudential Risk team understand that regulation continues to drive the strategic agenda for investment firms. They specialise in assisting clients across the financial services sector in navigating through the maze of regulation and support clients to identify regulatory obligations and work towards full compliance balanced with your business needs.
